@Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com> You are definitely right, I'll get
that in before I do docs release. If you don't mind I'll skip it in the
source though so I don't have to do another full release.

On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> I checked the LICENSE and NOTICE, and they both look good to me (the
> same as in previous releases), so not a blocker for me.
>
> I also checked:
> - the planned Avro readers used in both Flink and Spark, they are actually
> used
> - Signature and hash are good
> - No binary file found in the source distribution
> - ASF header is present in all expected file
> - Build is OK
> - Tested using Spark SQL with JDBC Catalog and Apache Polaris without
> problem
>
> Thanks !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:06 PM Russell Spitzer
> <russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Y'all,
> >
> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
> Iceberg 1.7.0 release.
> >
> > The commit ID is 91e04c9c88b63dc01d6c8e69dfdc8cd27ee811cc
> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc0
> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc0
> > *
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/91e04c9c88b63dc01d6c8e69dfdc8cd27ee811cc
> >
> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > *
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.7.0-rc0
> >
> > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
> >
> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository
> URL is:
> > * https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-
> <ID>/
> >
> > Please download, verify, and test.
> >
> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.7.0
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> >
> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
> encouraged to cast
> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes
> and more binding
> > +1 votes than -1 votes.
>

Reply via email to