+1 I had to read up a bit, thanks for driving this Anton.
Kind regards, Fokko Op do 31 okt 2024 om 07:53 schreef Piotr Findeisen < piotr.findei...@gmail.com>: > Thank you Anton, > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 05:07, John Zhuge <jzh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:56 PM Anton Okolnychyi <aokolnyc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> - Anton >>> >>> ср, 30 жовт. 2024 р. о 21:32 Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> пише: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:28 PM Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1! >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 30, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> -Dan >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:51 AM Prashant Singh < >>>>> prashant010...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Prashant >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:16 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 - My comments are clear on the other thread for future proposals >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:18 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -0 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great work and exciting functionality, but transferring concerns >>>>>>>> from the other thread about the decision. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Szehon >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:07 AM xianjin <xian...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré < >>>>>>>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:45 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>>>>>>>>> aokolnyc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Hi folks, >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > We have been discussing the new layout for position deletes in >>>>>>>>>>> V3 for a while now. It seems the community reached consensus. I'd >>>>>>>>>>> like to >>>>>>>>>>> start a vote on adding deletion vectors to the V3 spec as described >>>>>>>>>>> in PRs >>>>>>>>>>> 11238 and 11240. You can see a prototype of the proposed spec >>>>>>>>>>> changes in PR >>>>>>>>>>> 11302. >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Design doc discussion thread: >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ypt0jowf3zosw6f6bxt25jxc3vdgps9 >>>>>>>>>>> > Spec changes discussion thread: >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyon0kvroxsmkxh153444xzscwbb68o1 >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because... >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > - Anton >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> John Zhuge >> >
