Hi Ryan, Do you mean the doc Improve Position Deletes in V3 <https://docs.google.com/document/d/18Bqhr-vnzFfQk1S4AgRISkA_5_m5m32Nnc2Cw0zn2XM/edit?tab=t.0> by Anton? I don't recall Anton used the term "deletion vector" in his proposal.
On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:30 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it might be worth mentioning the current proposal makes some, > mostly minor, design choices to try to be compatible with Delta Lake > deletion vectors. I think there might be a general philosophical question > on what compromises the community is willing to make for compatibility > reasons. > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 2:42 PM rdb...@gmail.com <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> There seems to be broad agreement around Anton's proposal to use deletion >> vectors in Iceberg v3, so I've opened two PRs that update the spec with the >> proposed changes. The first, PR #11238 >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11238/files>, adds a new Puffin >> blob type, delete-vector-v1, that stores a delete vector. The second, PR >> #11240 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11240/files>, updates the >> Iceberg table spec. >> >> Please take a look and comment! >> >> Ryan >> >
