+1 on dropping JDK 8 support with Iceberg 1.7 and I agree that Iceberg 2.0 should mostly focus around breaking API changes.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 3:45 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi Piotr > > I agree to drop JDK8 support (and related modules). > > You have my informal "+1" (this is not a formal vote thread as the > subject doesn't contain [VOTE] :)). > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:35 PM Piotr Findeisen > <piotr.findei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > in the "Building with JDK 21" email thread we discussed adding JDK 21 > support and also dropping JDK 8 support, as these things were initially > related. > > A lot of people expressed acceptance for dropping JDK 8 support, and > release 2.0 was proposed as a timeline. > > There were also concerned raised, as some people still use JDK 8. > > > > Let me start this new thread for a discussion and perhaps formal vote > for dropping JDK 8 support in Iceberg 2.0 release. > > > > Best > > Piotr > > >
