Okay. I see...... 
I‘m so sad. :(
But anyway, thanks for answering all my questions.











在 2024-07-15 14:25:16,"Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> 写道:
>Hi
>
>HadoopCatalog is not a "recommended" catalog for production (at least
>up to now). So, we should consider either to move it in a separate
>repo (if we have the guarantee that it's gonna be maintained, else it
>doesn't make sense) or remove it to avoid confusion. My take here is
>the same (for several months :)): we should privilege the REST Catalog
>API and users should use a REST Catalog server implementation.
>
>Regards
>JB
>
>On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 8:13 AM lisoda <lis...@yeah.net> wrote:
>>
>> Sir. Even if the entire hadoopCatalog can be used without lockManager, 
>> should we delete it?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 在 2024-07-15 14:08:40,"Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> 写道:
>> >Hi
>> >
>> >My understanding is that lock manager is mostly used on the
>> >HadoopCatalog. The other catalogs relays on a third party lock
>> >mechanism: for instance, JDBC Catalog uses the RDBMS table/row
>> >locking, REST Catalog uses implementation lock.
>> >I would rather remove HadoopCatalog and the lock manager in favor of
>> >the REST catalog and implementation lock mechanism.
>> >
>> >Just my $0.01 :)
>> >
>> >Regards
>> >JB
>> >
>> >On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 7:41 AM lisoda <lis...@yeah.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Currently, the only lockManager implementation in iceberg-core is 
>> >> InMemoryLockManager. This PR extends two LockManager implementations, one 
>> >> based on the Redis, and another based on the Rest-API.
>> >> In general, most users use redisLockManager is sufficient to cope with 
>> >> most of the scenarios, for redis can not meet the user's requirements, we 
>> >> can let the user to provide a RestApi service to achieve this function. I 
>> >> believe that, for a long time, these two lock-manager's will satisfy most 
>> >> of the customer's needs.
>> >>
>> >> If someone could review this PR, that would be great.
>> >>
>> >> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10688
>> >> SLACK: 
>> >> https://apache-iceberg.slack.com/archives/C03LG1D563F/p1720761992982729

Reply via email to