Hello. Yea. Improving the commit mechanism is just the beginning.We also need to implement a distributed locking service for users who use object stores.I think the next step is to support iceberg-view and such. But I've never used iceberg's views before.It will take me some time to familiarise myself with the functionality of the view section, if I'm to be of any assistance. But if you need my help, I'll do anything what I can. Anyway, I'm glad to hear from you.
在 2024-07-04 22:04:17，"Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> 写道： >Hi, > >Thanks for the heads up and working on this ! > >My understanding of the HadoopCatalog is that we would need more than >an improved commit mechanism to be production ready (I'm thinking on >scalability, or view support). What's your thoughts? >By the way, I'm happy to take a look at adding view support if it helps. > >Regards >JB > >On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 8:27 AM lisoda <lis...@yeah.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Team. >> I've refactored the logic of the commit method in HadoopTableOptions.With >> this refactoring, I believe that hadoopCatalog is ready to be used in a >> production environment. Now HadoopTableOptions can implement atomic commits >> while being compatible with the differences in behaviour between block and >> object stores.Concurrency control is also supported.if anyone can assist me >> in reiewing this PR, that would be great. >> Also, any FileSystemCatalog's user can comment on this PR. Any advice would >> be invaluable to me. >> Thank you all. >> >> PR:https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10623 >> SLACK:https://apache-iceberg.slack.com/archives/C03LG1D563F/p1719993403208859
