Thanks Jack,

Are we set up to have a recording for this?  I think it's important that
people who cannot attend due to timezone or conflicts can still keep up to
speed with the discussion.  I don't think a summary is sufficient for full
context, but would be great to include with a linked recording.

Also, it appears that the transaction proposal
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/10tfqETygf2BLA34CoZLxK3v5xk1BWUNKFA9WE8X_w-U/edit#heading=h.kbf1q7197nxq>
doesn't have a corresponding Issue PR so that it can be tracked as an
improvement
proposal
<https://iceberg.apache.org/contribute/#apache-iceberg-improvement-proposals>.
If you're the sponsor can you create that issue?

-Dan



On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:10 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> Hi Jack
>
> Thanks !
> Just a reminder: we have to provide regular updates on the dev mailing
> list (as we say at Apache: if it doesn't happen on the mailing list,
> it never happened).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 7:11 AM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Sorry for the wait, here is the invite information about the Iceberg
> catalog sync. Let me know if the following links work, I am not very
> familiar with using Google Suite.
> >
> > Google group: https://groups.google.com/g/iceberg-catalog-sync
> >
> > Google calendar:
> https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r/week/2024/7/2?cid=ZjllNjJmZWNjN2ZiYWJmY2MwMDZjMTFjNWQ5MWY3Zjk5NmI0MWNkNTM1MDg1MDU1Njg0MDI3YTM5NzM3NWI1MUBncm91cC5jYWxlbmRhci5nb29nbGUuY29t
> >
> > Notes:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iPGVCIcr-M0XtAiudOguWAvmqIdVgpYN5vz5ohO8PKw/edit
> >
> > Because there are A LOT of topics to discuss, I am aggressively
> scheduling it to be weekly on Monday 9am pacific time. Once we get into a
> better shape, we can reduce the cadence.
> >
> > Please take a look at the meeting notes, feel free to edit existing
> topics or add more topics. Everyone should have full edit access.
> >
> > Looking forward to seeing everyone in the sync meetings!
> >
> > Best,
> > Jack Ye
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to