+1 Thanks so much for driving this Peter! On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 11:30 AM Péter Váry <peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone, > > I would like to make a proposal [1] to support Flink Table Maintenance in > Iceberg. The main goal is to have a solution where Flink can execute the > Maintenance Tasks as part of the streaming job. Especially Rewrite Data > Files, Rewrite Manifest Files and Expire Snapshots. > The secondary goal is to provide building blocks for Flink batch jobs to > execute the Maintenance Tasks independently, where the scheduling is done > outside of Flink. > > This proposal is the outcome of extensive community discussions on the > mailing list [2, 3]. > > Please respond with your recommendation: > +1 if you support moving forward with the two separate objects model. > 0 if you are neutral. > -1 if you disagree with the two separate objects model. > > Thanks, > Peter > > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10264 > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/yjcwbf1037jdq4prty6rtrrqmjzc71o0 > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/10mdf9zo6pn0dfq791nf4w1m7jh9k3sl >
