+1 (binding)

Verified all the usual things
Ran full test suite
Everything looking good

> On Mar 8, 2024, at 11:35 PM, Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> * Verified signature
> * Verified checksum
> * RAT check
> * built JDK 11
> * Ran basic tests on Spark 3.5
> 
> Thanks
> Szehon
> 
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:50 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <am...@tabular.io 
> <mailto:am...@tabular.io>> wrote:
>> +1 non-binding
>> 
>> Verified signatures,checksums,RAT checks, build, and tests with JDK11. I 
>> also ran ad-hoc tests for views in Trino with the rest catalog.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>> 
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io 
>> <mailto:b...@tabular.io>> wrote:
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> 
>>> - Normal tarball verification
>>> - Read from my broken view successfully
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 3:07 PM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org 
>>> <mailto:dwe...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>> 
>>>> Verified sigs/sums/license/build/tests (Java 17)
>>>> 
>>>> -Dan
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 2:10 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr 
>>>> <mailto:huss...@awala.fr>> wrote:
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>> - checked checksum and signature
>>>>> - built from source with jdk11
>>>>> - tested read and write with Spark 3.5.1 and Glue catalog
>>>>> 
>>>>> All looks good
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 10:49 PM Drew <img...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:img...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - verified signature and checksum
>>>>>> - verified RAT license check
>>>>>> - verified build/tests passing with JDK17
>>>>>> - ran some manual tests on Spark3.5 with GlueCatalog
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Drew
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 4:38 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:ajanthab...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> * validated checksum and signature
>>>>>>> * checked license docs & ran RAT checks
>>>>>>> * ran build and tests with JDK11
>>>>>>> * verified view support for Nessie catalog with Spark 3.5.
>>>>>>> * verified this RC against Trino 
>>>>>>> (https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/20957)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> - Ajantha
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:25 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net 
>>>>>>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - checksums and signatures are OK
>>>>>>>> - ASF headers are present
>>>>>>>> - No unexpected binary files in the source distribution
>>>>>>>> - Build OK with JDK11
>>>>>>>> - JdbcCatalog tested on Trino and Iceland
>>>>>>>> - No unexpected artifact distributed
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:04 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com 
>>>>>>>> <mailto:ajanthab...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache 
>>>>>>>> > Iceberg 1.5.0 release.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The commit ID is 2519ab43d654927802cc02e19c917ce90e8e0265
>>>>>>>> > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc6
>>>>>>>> > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc6
>>>>>>>> > * 
>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/2519ab43d654927802cc02e19c917ce90e8e0265
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>>> > * 
>>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.5.0-rc6
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>>> > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven 
>>>>>>>> > repository URL is:
>>>>>>>> > * 
>>>>>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1161/
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.5.0
>>>>>>>> > [ ] +0
>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are 
>>>>>>>> > encouraged to cast
>>>>>>>> > non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 
>>>>>>>> > votes and more binding
>>>>>>>> > +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > - Ajantha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>> Tabular

Reply via email to