+1, thanks for working on this Brian.

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:02 AM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote:

> It looks like we have lazy consensus, so we'll go ahead with the
> switch-over so we don't need to go through the old process for the 1.5.0
> release.
>
> Thanks to Brian for pushing this forward, and to everyone that helped
> review and get this change ready! I think it will be a positive step for
> improving our docs!
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:13 AM Yufei Gu <flyrain...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 Thanks Brian!
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:57 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I did some reviews of the PRs that led up to this, and I think the new
>>> site is much easier to maintain and deploy. +1 from my end :)
>>>
>>> Cheers, Fokko
>>>
>>> Op ma 29 jan 2024 om 15:15 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
>>> >:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:40 PM Brian Olsen <bitsondata...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hey everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> > As discussed during the community sync, I'd like to get a vote on
>>>> moving forward with the documentation. I have created a PR (
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/9520) that references the
>>>> changes that have happened up to this point.
>>>> >
>>>> > Simpler contribution by collocating the website and documentation in
>>>> the same repository.
>>>> > We don't want the versioned docs or javadoc files to be tracked in the
>>>> > main branch to avoid multiple copies of the docs being indexed in
>>>> GitHub or
>>>> > IDEs.
>>>> > We need a top level (non-versioned) Iceberg website that links
>>>> versioned
>>>> > docs and contains evergreen constructs.
>>>> > The current docs release process is cumbersome and the code lives
>>>> across
>>>> > multiple repositories making it difficult to know where to contribute
>>>> for
>>>> > documentation: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8151.
>>>> > We wanted there to be an easy way to apply retroactive fixes to older
>>>> doc
>>>> > versions.
>>>> > A simple release process can now be automated once we validate things
>>>> work well manually by starting a workflow and reviewing a PR.
>>>> > Restyle Mkdocs default theme to look like the existing Iceberg theme.
>>>> > Fix broken links (there were a lot).
>>>> >
>>>> > It would be great to get a quick vote on moving forward with this
>>>> process. Thanks!
>>>> >
>>>> > - Bits
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Tabular
>

Reply via email to