Currently, there is no established group discussions. The project was recently 
open-sourced, and communication is currently done through GitHub. (If the 
project is accepted into the ASF incubator, mailing lists will be created). If 
you're interested in regular meetings, feel free to suggest it to the community 
on GitHub.

Thanks,
Jesús


On 2023/12/05 06:30:38 Gaurav Agarwal wrote:
> HI
> Thanks for this mail , I would like to know is there any group discussion
> also happened or any call to discuss the issues.
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:29 AM Walaa Eldin Moustafa <wa.moust...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Thanks Jesus for sharing OneTable. Looks like it touches upon some of the
> > topics we discussed in the Rise of Table Formats panel at VLDB
> > <https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3462/CDMS18.pdf> back in September. I was
> > browsing through the source code, and I ran into the OneField
> > <https://github.com/onetable-io/onetable/blob/main/api/src/main/java/io/onetable/model/schema/OneField.java>
> >  class
> > and noticed it has support for default values, which is good, but in the
> > Iceberg spec, there are two default values
> > <https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/#default-values> (more details in the
> > spec and respective PR). I was pointing this out as an example of small
> > nuances that can differ from one format to another and was wondering how
> > OneTable is planning to bridge them?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Walaa.
> >
> >
> 

Reply via email to