+1 (non binding) I checked: - hash and signatures are good - I will check NOTICE (copyright is 2022 and I think some deps are missing there), not release blocker - ASF headers are present - no binary file detected - very quick test
Regards JB On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 8:48 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I propose that we release the following RC as the official PyIceberg 0.5.1 > release. > > This is a patch release due to bugs: > > - Part of the expression is ignored when multiple and/or expressions are > specified > - Update like statements to reflect sql behaviors > > That has been found. Smaller bugs also have been backported. > > The commit ID is 891b4c7f4214fb9118080ce2215a210a770a5019 > > * This corresponds to the tag: pyiceberg-0.5.1rc2 > (c5085159079fe100b7fbd38b5037d1408525dc46) > * https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/releases/tag/pyiceberg-0.5.1rc2 > * > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/tree/891b4c7f4214fb9118080ce2215a210a770a5019 > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/pyiceberg-0.5.1rc2/ > > You can find the KEYS file here: > > * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS > > Convenience binary artifacts are staged on pypi: > > https://pypi.org/project/pyiceberg/0.5.1rc2/ > > And can be installed using: pip3 install pyiceberg==0.5.1rc2 > > Please download, verify, and test. > > Please vote in the next 72 hours. > [ ] +1 Release this as PyIceberg 0.5.1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > > Consider this mail my +1 vote (binding) after running against our example > notebooks. > > Kind regards, Fokko
