Ugh, it looks like the filter pushdown issue is a regression. I tested 1.3.1 and it worked. I guess it is because we migrated to V2 filters and their behavior is different. I need to take a closer look.
On 2023/09/29 11:36:09 Eduard Tudenhoefner wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > * validated checksum and signature > * checked license docs & ran RAT checks > * ran build and tests with JDK17 > * ran some tests with Spark 3.4 + 3.5 and the new iceberg-aws-bundle.jar > * ran some internal tests > > I found two test issues with Flink (#8680 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8680> and #8679 > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/8679>) while running tests > locally, but that shouldn't block the release. > > Also thanks to Anton for doing the release and everyone else who > contributed! > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:44 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks Anton for running the release and everyone who contributed! Checks > > I did: > > > > - Updated the docker-spark-iceberg repo > > <https://github.com/tabular-io/docker-spark-iceberg/pull/93>, and > > everything runs fine (still with Spark 3.4 since there were some problems > > with Jupyters' Scala 2.13 kernel). This includes new new aws-bundle 🥳 > > - Tested against Trino <https://github.com/trinodb/trino/pull/19188>, > > and found three differences, but expected: > > - More defensive cleaning up of files on a failed commit, to make > > table recovery easier when needed. > > - A new property that's set on the table, indicating zstd > > compression. > > - Changes in the exceptions when binding a transform to a column > > type that is not allowed. > > > > Kind regards, Fokko > > > > > > Op vr 29 sep 2023 om 07:35 schreef Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>: > > > >> +1 (non binding) > >> > >> I checked: > >> - signatures and hash are ok > >> - asf headers are present > >> - no binary in the source distribution > >> - build is ok > >> > >> NB: I’m working on a set of use cases with different data sets but it’s > >> not yet complete. I should have it for next release and be able to compare > >> queries time and behavior between releases. > >> > >> Thanks ! > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> Le jeu. 28 sept. 2023 à 04:02, Anton Okolnychyi > >> <aokolnyc...@apple.com.invalid> a écrit : > >> > >>> Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache > >>> Iceberg 1.4.0 release. > >>> > >>> The commit ID is 8f37faa6a21e863551b17992370edc0f8706465d > >>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.4.0-rc1 > >>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.4.0-rc1 > >>> * > >>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/8f37faa6a21e863551b17992370edc0f8706465d > >>> > >>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here: > >>> * > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.4.0-rc1 > >>> > >>> You can find the KEYS file here: > >>> * https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/KEYS > >>> > >>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven repository > >>> URL is: > >>> * > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1145/ > >>> > >>> Please download, verify, and test. > >>> > >>> Please vote in the next 72 hours. (Weekends excluded) > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.4.0 > >>> [ ] +0 > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because... > >>> > >>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are > >>> encouraged to cast non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 > >>> binding +1 votes and more binding +1 votes than -1 votes. > >>> > >>> - Anton > >> > >> >
