One of the issues is we kind of have a dual repo doc process. Most doc changes that are versioned are made in the main oss apache repo and they are copied over when Iceberg is released. So changes against the doc repo are only for fixing past docs or non-versioned pages.
I'll take a quick look at the outstanding PR's but most of them seem to be awaiting changes On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:05 AM Zsolt Miskolczi <zsolt.miskol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey team! > > First of all, thank you for giving us Iceberg. I really love the concept > of how Iceberg structures the files and I'm pretty sure it is the feature > of storing files in big data. > > However, the community is pretty active about developing Iceberg, I have a > feeling that documentation doesn't get the attention that it deserves. > > I saw the open pull requests in iceberg-docs > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pulls> and I couldn't not notice > that there are pull requests that are more than a month old and didn't > receive any review at all. > > Can I draw your attention to the community about documentation? > > Thank you, > Zsolt Miskolczi > >
