Hi Szehon, Thank you for the updates. I'm in favor of 1.3.1 as well. I got notified of a discrepancy <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8049> in Java's TableMetadata reader today. I have a fix here <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8050> against the master branch. Once that is in, I think it would be great to backport this to 1.3.x as well.
Kind regards, Fokko Op wo 12 jul 2023 om 22:09 schreef Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com>: > Hi guys > > Just an update on this. Another issue came up about the new 1.3.0 > function rewrite_position_deletes (thanks Fokko for adding to the > milestone). I'm working on that, hopefully can finish in next day or two, > for this release. > > Milestone for reference: > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestones/Iceberg%201.3.1 > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks Eduard! Merged all your backport prs, I will commit the last one >> probably tomorrow and then we can start the release. >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 11:53 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@tabular.io> >> wrote: >> >>> I created a 1.3.x <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1.3.x> >>> branch, so that we can start backporting those bug fixes. >>> >>> Eduard >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks a lot Eduard! I think >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933 is also a good candidate >>>> as well. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Szehon >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@tabular.io> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed> >>>>> and it would be great to also get #7621 >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in. >>>>> >>>>> Eduard >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put >>>>>> in a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a >>>>>> time to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to >>>>>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project >>>>>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg >>>>>> releases to fix third-party projects? >>>>>> >>>>>> Ryan >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Hi >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for >>>>>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue >>>>>>> found >>>>>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) : >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277 >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also >>>>>>> let me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can >>>>>>> give >>>>>>> it a shot as well. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>> > Szehon >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ryan Blue >>>>>> Tabular >>>>>> >>>>>
