Yes, yes, yes! - Anton
> On Apr 19, 2023, at 8:17 AM, Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote: > > Sounds like we have consensus for removing Spark 2.4. > > Thanks, everyone! > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:36 AM Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com > <mailto:ajanthab...@gmail.com>> wrote: > +1, > Spark-2.4 has reached EOL > (https://lists.apache.org/thread/tdk7r5gx3nwrds3fg7qmp5h2jnqgc6tb > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/tdk7r5gx3nwrds3fg7qmp5h2jnqgc6tb> and > https://spark.apache.org/versioning-policy.html > <https://spark.apache.org/versioning-policy.html>) > > Thanks, > Ajantha > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 3:52 AM Edgar Rodriguez > <edgar.rodrig...@airbnb.com.invalid> wrote: > I'm generally +1 on dropping Spark 2.4 - mostly everyone is moving to Spark > 3.x, if not already moved. > > As for the Hadoop upgrade, I think that could be problematic for us if > there's any non-backwards compatible API change required at compile time > since we're still running a 2.8.x version. > > Cheers, > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 3:50 PM Steve Zhang <hongyue_zh...@apple.com.invalid> > wrote: > +1 for dropping Spark 2.4 support and we can clean up doc as well such as > https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-queries/#spark-24 > <https://iceberg.apache.org/docs/latest/spark-queries/#spark-24> > > Thanks, > Steve Zhang > > > >> On Apr 13, 2023, at 12:53 PM, Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com >> <mailto:yezhao...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> +1 for dropping 2.4 support >> > > > > -- > Edgar R > Data Warehouse Infrastructure > > > -- > Ryan Blue > Tabular
