I closed the upgrade project and marked the FLIP-27 project priority 1.
Thanks for all the work to get this done!

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 8:10 PM OpenInx <open...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Update:
>
> I think the project  [Flink: Upgrade to 1.13.2][1] in RoadMap can be
> closed now, because all of the issues have been addressed.
>
> [1]. https://github.com/apache/iceberg/projects/12
>
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 6:17 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@dremio.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I created a Roadmap section in
>>  https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3163
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3163> that links to the planning
>> boards that Jack created. I figured it makes sense if we link available
>> Design Docs directly on those Boards (as was already done), because then
>> the Design docs are closer to the set of related issues.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:02 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Jack!
>>>
>>> Eduard, I think that's a good idea. We should have a roadmap page as
>>> well that links to the projects that Jack just created.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:57 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems like we have reached some consensus around the projects listed
>>>> here. I have created corresponding Github projects for each:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/projects
>>>>
>>>> Related design docs are also linked there.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Jack Ye
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 11:18 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <edu...@dremio.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Would it make sense to have a section on the website where we collect
>>>>> all the links to the design docs/specs as that would be easier to find 
>>>>> than
>>>>> searching for things on the ML?
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking about something like for each component:
>>>>> * link to the ML discussion
>>>>> * link to the actual Spec/Design Doc
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:38 PM Ryan Blue <b...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the last sync meeting, we brought up publishing a community
>>>>>> roadmap and brainstormed the many features and initiatives that the
>>>>>> community is working on. In this thread, I want to make sure that we 
>>>>>> have a
>>>>>> good list of what people are thinking about and I think we should try to
>>>>>> categorize the projects by size and general priority. When we reach a 
>>>>>> rough
>>>>>> agreement, I’ll write this up and post it on the ASF site along with 
>>>>>> links
>>>>>> to some projects in Github.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My rationale for attempting to prioritize projects is that if we try
>>>>>> to do too many things, it will be slower progress across everything 
>>>>>> rather
>>>>>> than getting a few important items done. I know that priorities don’t 
>>>>>> align
>>>>>> very cleanly in practice, but it is hopefully worth trying. To come up 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> a priority, I’m trying to keep top priority items to a minimum by 
>>>>>> including
>>>>>> only one from each group (Spark, Flink, Python, etc.). The remaining 
>>>>>> items
>>>>>> are split between priority 2 and 3. Priority 3 is not urgent, including
>>>>>> things that can be plugged in (like other IO libraries), docs, etc.
>>>>>> Everything else is priority 2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That something isn’t priority 1 doesn’t mean it isn’t important or
>>>>>> progressing, just that it isn’t the current focus. I think of it this 
>>>>>> way:
>>>>>> if someone has extra time to review something, what should be next? 
>>>>>> That’s
>>>>>> top priority.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here’s my rough categorization. If you disagree, please speak up:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - If you think that something should be top priority, what gets
>>>>>>    moved to priority 2?
>>>>>>    - Should the priority for a project in 2 or 3 change?
>>>>>>    - Is the S/M/L size of a project wrong?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Top priority, 1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - API: Iceberg 1.0 [medium]
>>>>>>    - Spark: Merge-on-read plans [large]
>>>>>>    - Maintenance: Delete file compaction [medium]
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Flink: Upgrade to 1.13.2 (document compatibility) [medium]
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Python: Pythonic refactor [medium]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Priority 2:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - ORC: Support delete files stored as ORC [small]
>>>>>>    - Spark: DSv2 streaming improvements [small]
>>>>>>    - Flink: Inline file compaction [small]
>>>>>>    - Flink: Support UPSERT [small]
>>>>>>    - Views: Spec [medium]
>>>>>>    - Spec: Z-ordering / Space-filling curves [medium]
>>>>>>    - Spec: Snapshot tagging and branching [small]
>>>>>>    - Spec: Secondary indexes [large]
>>>>>>    - Spec v3: Encryption [large]
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Spec v3: Relative paths [large]
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Spec v3: Default field values [medium]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Priority 3:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - Docs: versioned docs [medium]
>>>>>>    - IO: Support Aliyun OSS/DLF [medium]
>>>>>>    - IO: Support Dell ECS [medium]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> External:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - Trino: Bucketed joins [small]
>>>>>>    - Trino: Row-level delete support [medium]
>>>>>>    - Trino: Merge-on-read plans [medium]
>>>>>>    - Trino: Multi-catalog support [small]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>> Tabular
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>> Tabular
>>>
>>

-- 
Ryan Blue
Tabular

Reply via email to