Hi @OpenInx<mailto:[email protected]>,
The code change is based on our internal fork. We need to some refactoring before sending out an open source PR. In addition, since there is no spec defined in Iceberg, the implementation is coupled closely to our code base. That is one of the major reasons that I put my thoughts on building data format and compute engine agnostic into the draft. Miao From: OpenInx <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, January 28, 2021 at 6:31 PM To: Iceberg Dev List <[email protected]>, Miao Wang <[email protected]> Cc: Ryan Blue <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Sync to discuss secondary index proposal Sorry I sent the wrong link, the secondary index document link is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E1ofBQoKRnX04bWT3utgyHQGaHZoelgXosk_UNsTUuQ/edit<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1E1ofBQoKRnX04bWT3utgyHQGaHZoelgXosk_UNsTUuQ%2Fedit&data=04%7C01%7Cmiwang%40adobe.com%7C7d97fc234caf481f4a5508d8c3fe0623%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637474843077023815%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=QkXoJydi3dCc6xWaQLjfcHsuA%2FZZlKsEXMRDoMEnUWE%3D&reserved=0> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:31 AM OpenInx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi @Miao Wang<mailto:[email protected]> Would you mind to share your current PoC code or PR for this document [1] if possible ? I'd like to understand more details before I get involved in this discussion. Thanks. [1]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q6xaBxUPFwYsW9aXWxYUh7die6O7rDeAPFQcTAMQ0GM/edit?ts=601316b0#<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1q6xaBxUPFwYsW9aXWxYUh7die6O7rDeAPFQcTAMQ0GM%2Fedit%3Fts%3D601316b0%23&data=04%7C01%7Cmiwang%40adobe.com%7C7d97fc234caf481f4a5508d8c3fe0623%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637474843077023815%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hgiPjL%2B0IqQxCJ9W700snLDeBthvumjQcG0DUNk5tKM%3D&reserved=0> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:16 AM 李响 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1, my colleagues and I is at UTC+8 On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:50 AM OpenInx <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1, my time zone is CST. On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:57 AM Xinli shang <[email protected]> wrote: I had some earlier discussion with Miao on this. I am still interested in it. My time zone is PST. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Jack Ye <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: +1, looking forward to the discussion, please include me and Yan ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>), also in PST. -Jack On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:16 PM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: CST Please :) But I don’t mind waking up early or staying up late as required On Jan 28, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Ryan Blue <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi everyone, The proposal that Miao wrote about secondary indexes has come up a lot lately. I think it would be a good time to have a discussion about the proposal and set some initial goals for what we want to do next. Since there hasn't been much discussion on the dev list, I'll schedule a sync so that everyone has a deadline to read the proposal and be ready with questions. Then we can have a quick summary to start with and a productive discussion. First, who is interested in attending? I think that Miao and I are in the US in PST (UTC-8). I think Paula from IBM in Israel is interested. Anyone else in a time zone that we should try to include? We can always have two discussions if we need to include more zones. Please reply if you're interested so we can get something set up. Thanks! rb -- Ryan Blue Software Engineer Netflix -- Xinli Shang -- 李响 Xiang Li 手机 cellphone ：+86-136-8113-8972 邮件 e-mail ：[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
