I have a random comment on this project versus others I'm involved in. This
is not meant to be critical, it's just an observation.

It feels like very little discussion happens on the dev list other than the
random technical support email. Basically, all interaction is on Github (?)
but there are no notifications of Github ticket creations against the dev
list. If you look at the dev list, the last three months we had email
counts of Oct: 109, Nov: 35, Dec: 15. When I saw the ~35 prs closed/month
number in the report I was shocked given the lack of email on the dev list.

What do other people think about this?


On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 10:28 AM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I've posted the initial draft of our report to the IPMC. If you have
> anything to add, please reply!
>
> rb
>
> --------------------
> ## Iceberg
>
> Iceberg is a table format for large, slow-moving tabular data.
>
> Iceberg has been incubating since 2018-11-16.
>
> ### Three most important unfinished issues to address before graduating:
>
>   1. Grow the Iceberg community
>   2. Add more committers and PPMC members
>
> ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of?
>
> No issues.
>
> ### How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> In the 4 months since the last report, 138 pull requests were merged for
> an average of 34.5 per month. While this is down from the previous monthly
> average of 49.6 per month for June through August, this contribution rate
> is still very active and healthy. Contributions are coming from a regular
> group of contributors outside of the initial set of committers, which is a
> positive indication for adding new committers and PPMC members over the
> next few months.
>
> The community released the first version of Apache Iceberg,
> 0.7.0-incubating. This release used the "standard" incubator disclaimer and
> included convenience binaries. The release candidate votes were very active
> with community members testing out the release and reporting problems.
>
> There was an Apache Iceberg talk at ApacheCon NA in September.
>
> ### How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>   - The community is building support for the upcoming Spark 3.0 release
>   - The first PR from the vectorization branch has been merged into master
>   - Support for IN and NOT IN predicates was contributed
>   - Python added support for Hive metastore tables and the read path is
> near commit
>   - Flaky tests have been fixed
>   - Baseline checks (style, errorprone, findbugs) are now applied to all
> modules
>
> ### How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> Please feel free to add your own commentary.
>
>   - [ ] Initial setup
>   - [ ] Working towards first release
>   - [x] Community building
>   - [x] Nearing graduation
>   - [ ] Other:
>
> ### Date of last release:
>
>   - 0.7.0-incubating was released 25 October 2019
>
> ### When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
>
>   - Anton Okolnychyi was added 30 August 2019
>
> ### Have your mentors been helpful and responsive?
>
> Yes. 4 of 5 mentors voted on the 0.7.0-incubating IPMC vote. Thanks to our
> mentors for being active!
>
> ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks?
>
> Yes, the podling is managing the brand and is not aware of any issues.
> The project name has been approved.
>
> ### Signed-off-by:
>
>   - [x] (iceberg) Ryan Blue
>      Comments:
>   - [ ] (iceberg) Julien Le Dem
>      Comments:
>   - [ ] (iceberg) Owen O'Malley
>      Comments:
>   - [ ] (iceberg) James Taylor
>      Comments:
>   - [ ] (iceberg) Carl Steinbach
>      Comments:
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Software Engineer
> Netflix
>

Reply via email to