+1
On 2019/02/27 21:41:56, RD <rdsr...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:40 PM Matt Cheah <mch...@palantir.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > *From: *Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com.INVALID> > > *Reply-To: *"dev@iceberg.apache.org" <dev@iceberg.apache.org>, " > > rb...@netflix.com" <rb...@netflix.com> > > *Date: *Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 1:36 PM > > *To: *Iceberg Dev List <dev@iceberg.apache.org> > > *Subject: *Re: [VOTE] Community code reviews > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:11 PM Ryan Blue <rb...@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > This is a follow-up to the discussion thread, where we seem to have > > consensus around the proposal to allow committers to commit their own pull > > requests if a contributor has reviewed it and given a +1 and the PR has > > been open for at least a couple of days to give time for other comments. > > This is also only effective for 2019. After that, we should rely on a > > larger base of committers. > > > > > > > > Please vote on this proposal in the next 3 days. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, accept contributor reviews for committer pull requests > > > > [ ] +0, . . . > > > > [ ] -1, I think this is a bad idea because . . . > > > > > > > > > > > > rb > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ryan Blue > > > > Software Engineer > > > > Netflix > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Ryan Blue > > > > Software Engineer > > > > Netflix > > >
