Hi Arvind, Iceberg assumes that all file locations are unique. If two snapshots refer to the same location, then whatever data file (or version) is in that location is what is read. What is your use case?
Apache Iceberg has no official releases yet. We still need to do some license work for binaries, get the build set up for Apache publication, finish a few more PRs, and rename packages. In the mean time, you can use JitPack to build binaries for specific commits. That should allow you to easily test the project if you don't want to build it yourself. On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 6:27 PM Arvind Pruthi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello There, > > > > Q1. What happens In case a file is deleted and a new file is to be added > with the same name, but the snapshot in which the delete was registered is > still around? There is no ambiguity from listing the manifest entries point > of view. However, there will be ambiguity at the Hdfs level. How is that > resolved? Also any thoughts on if a file needs to be replaced with a > different file with the same name (We have a use case for this)? > > > > Q2. Are the iceberg jars being published anywhere? I couldn’t find them in > maven central. > > > > Thanks, > > Arvind > -- Ryan Blue Software Engineer Netflix
