+1 to git!
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Xuefu Zhang <xzh...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Switching to git from svn seems to be a proposal slightly different from
> that of switching to pull request from the head of the thread. Personally
> I'm +1 to git, but I think patches are very portable and widely adopted in
> Hadoop ecosystem and we should keep the practice. Thus, +1 to that also.
>
> --Xuefu
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Gunther Hagleitner <
> ghagleit...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Once Prasad's loop finishes I'd like to add my +1 too.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Vaibhav Gumashta <
> > vgumas...@hortonworks.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for moving to git!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Vaibhav
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pras...@cloudera.com
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > while (true) {
> > > > +1
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +1 // another, just in case ;)
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > Prasad
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:47 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com <
> > > > kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Thejas Nair <
> the...@hortonworks.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Should we start with moving our primary source code repository
> from
> > > > > > svn to git ? I feel git is more powerful and easy to use (once
> you
> > go
> > > > > > past the learning curve!).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Personally I prefer the Github workflow, but I believe there
> have
> > > > been
> > > > > > > some challenges with that since the source for apache projects
> > must
> > > > be
> > > > > > > stored in apache source control (git or svn).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Relevent:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > <kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Since we have a nice mirrored git repository for hive[1], any
> > > > specific
> > > > > > >> reason why we can't switch to doing pull requests instead of
> > > > patches?
> > > > > > IMHO
> > > > > > >> pull requests are awesome for peer review plus it is also very
> > > easy
> > > > to
> > > > > > keep
> > > > > > >> track of JIRAs with open pull requests instead of looking for
> > > JIRAs
> > > > > in a
> > > > > > >> "Patch Available" state. Also since they get updated
> > > automatically,
> > > > it
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> also very easy to see if a review comment made by a reviewer
> was
> > > > > > addressed
> > > > > > >> properly or not.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/hive
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> Swarnim
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce -
> > http://mrunit.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > > > entity
> > > > > to
> > > > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > > confidential,
> > > > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> the
> > > > reader
> > > > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > > notified
> > > > > that
> > > > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> > have
> > > > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > > > immediately
> > > > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Swarnim
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
