Switching to git from svn seems to be a proposal slightly different from
that of switching to pull request from the head of the thread. Personally
I'm +1 to git, but I think patches are very portable and widely adopted in
Hadoop ecosystem and we should keep the practice. Thus, +1 to that also.

--Xuefu


On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Gunther Hagleitner <
ghagleit...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Once Prasad's loop finishes I'd like to add my +1 too.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Vaibhav Gumashta <
> vgumas...@hortonworks.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1 for moving to git!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Vaibhav
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pras...@cloudera.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >   while (true) {
> > >    +1
> > >   }
> > >
> > >   +1  // another, just in case ;)
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > Prasad
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:47 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com <
> > > kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Thejas Nair <the...@hortonworks.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Should we start with moving our primary source code repository from
> > > > > svn to git ? I feel git is more powerful and easy to use (once you
> go
> > > > > past the learning curve!).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Brock Noland <br...@cloudera.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > Personally I prefer the Github workflow, but I believe there have
> > > been
> > > > > > some challenges with that since the source for apache projects
> must
> > > be
> > > > > > stored in apache source control (git or svn).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Relevent:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 9:19 AM, kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com
> > > > > > <kulkarni.swar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> Hello,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Since we have a nice mirrored git repository for hive[1], any
> > > specific
> > > > > >> reason why we can't switch to doing pull requests instead of
> > > patches?
> > > > > IMHO
> > > > > >> pull requests are awesome for peer review plus it is also very
> > easy
> > > to
> > > > > keep
> > > > > >> track of JIRAs with open pull requests instead of looking for
> > JIRAs
> > > > in a
> > > > > >> "Patch Available" state. Also since they get updated
> > automatically,
> > > it
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> also very easy to see if a review comment made by a reviewer was
> > > > > addressed
> > > > > >> properly or not.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thoughts?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/hive
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Swarnim
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce -
> http://mrunit.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > > entity
> > > > to
> > > > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > confidential,
> > > > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > > reader
> > > > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > notified
> > > > that
> > > > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> > > > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > > > immediately
> > > > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Swarnim
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
> to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to