Hi, On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 2013, at 12:22 PM, Brock Noland wrote: > > > Looks good from my perspective and I glad to see this moving forward. > > > > Regarding #4 (JIRA) > > > > "I don't know if there's a way to upload existing JIRAs into Hive's JIRA, > > but I think it would be better to leave them where they are." > > > > JIRA has a bulk move feature, but I am curious as why we would leave them > > under the old project? There might be good reason to orphan them, but my > > first thought is that it would be nice to have them under the HIVE > project > > simply for search purposes. > > I was thinking it would be hard for people who had bookmarks or pointers > to the existing JIRAs. Also, since it would change all the JIRA numbers on > closed JIRAs it would make records from previous releases a mess. But I > see what you're saying about making search hard. Maybe there's a way to > leave the historical info where it is while importing any active JIRAs into > Hive so people can search them. > Yeah new jira numbers for old issues, might be a mess. The bulk move operator allows you to select any combination of issues such as open issues. Also, once moved the old JIRA will redirect to the new jira. If we are interested in pursuing this, I'd be happy to help. Cheers, Brock
