+1. Alan.
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Sergio Pena <sergio.p...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Gunther Hagleitner < > ghagleit...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > ________________________________________ > > From: Sankar Hariappan <shariap...@hortonworks.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 9:03 AM > > To: dev@hive.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Stricter commit guidelines > > > > +1 > > > > > > On 15/05/18, 9:30 PM, "Sahil Takiar" <takiar.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >+1 > > > > > >On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Owen O'Malley <owen.omal...@gmail.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Peter Vary <pv...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > +1 - Hoping for something like this for a long while! Thanks for > > taking > > >> > this up all! > > >> > > > >> > > On May 15, 2018, at 5:44 PM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez < > > >> > jcama...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Forgot to mention the length of the vote in original message. > > >> > > > > >> > > Let's leave the vote open for a shorter period than usual, for > > instance > > >> > 48 hours, i.e., till Wednesday 10pm PST. Situation can only get > worse > > >> than > > >> > it is now if we do not take action for a longer period. > > >> > > > > >> > > As Alan suggested, vote passes if there is a lazy majority (at > > least 3 > > >> > votes, more +1s than -1s). > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Jesús > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On 5/15/18, 8:37 AM, "Andrew Sherman" <asher...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 > > >> > > > > >> > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:34 AM Rui Li <lirui.fu...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> +1 > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Prasanth Jayachandran < > > >> > >> pjayachand...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > >> > >> > > >> > >>> +1 > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Thanks > > >> > >>> Prasanth > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:44 PM -0700, "Jesus Camacho > Rodriguez" > > < > > >> > >>> jcama...@apache.org<mailto:jcama...@apache.org>> wrote: > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> After work has been done to ignore most of the tests that were > > >> failing > > >> > >>> consistently/intermittently [1], I wanted to start this vote to > > >> gather > > >> > >>> support from the community to be stricter wrt committing patches > > to > > >> > Hive. > > >> > >>> The committers guide [2] already specifies that a +1 should be > > >> obtained > > >> > >>> before committing, but there is another clause that allows > > committing > > >> > >> under > > >> > >>> the presence of flaky tests (clause 4). Flaky tests are as good > as > > >> > having > > >> > >>> no tests, hence I propose to remove clause 4 and enforce the +1 > > from > > >> > >>> testing infra before committing. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> As I see it, by enforcing that we always get a +1 from the > testing > > >> > infra > > >> > >>> before committing, 1) we will have a more stable project, and 2) > > we > > >> > will > > >> > >>> have another incentive as a community to create a more robust > > testing > > >> > >>> infra, e.g., replacing flaky tests for similar unit tests that > are > > >> not > > >> > >>> flaky, trying to decrease running time for tests, etc. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Please, share your thoughts about this. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Here is my +1. > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Thanks, > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> Jes?s > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hive-dev/201805. > > >> > >>> mbox/%3C63023673-AEE5-41A9-BA52-5A5DFB2078B6%40apache.org%3E > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/ > > >> > >>> HowToCommit#HowToCommit-PreCommitruns,andcommittingpatches > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -- > > >> > >> Best regards! > > >> > >> Rui Li > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >Sahil Takiar > > >Software Engineer > > >takiar.sa...@gmail.com | (510) 673-0309 > > > > > > >
