Hi Carl, Here is the list of 17 active PMC members:
Brock Noland Carl Steinbach Edward Capriolo Alan Gates Gunther Hagleitner Ashutosh Chauhan Jason Dere Lefty Leverenz Navis Ryu Owen O'Malley Prasad Suresh Mujumdar Prasanth J Harish Butani Szehon Ho Thejas Madhavan Nair Vikram Dixit K Xuefu Zhang Non active members: Ashish Thusoo Kevin Wilfong He Yongqiang Namit Jain Joydeep Sensarma Ning Zhang Raghotham Murthy https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=text%20~%20%22kevin%20wilfong%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22ashish%20thusoo%22%20or%20text%20~%20%22heyongqiang%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22Namit%20Jain%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22joydeep%20sensarma%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22ning%20zhang%22%20OR%20text%20~%20%22raghotham%20murthy%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20Hive%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC In the results, only the first 4/5 need to be considered because of the time line of 6 months. All of them were resolved in prior years and the last comments are mostly hudson or closing comments by others. I could not see any mails from them on the mailing lists either during this period. Thus those 7 members haven't met the criterion for being active as specified in the hive bylaws. Should I change the bylaw for this type of vote happening to dev list instead of the user mailing list as it is currently stated? Thanks Vikram. On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Carl Steinbach <cwsteinb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Vikram, > > Can you please post the names of the 17 currently active PMC members so > that we have it for the records? > > Also, according to the bylaws this vote was supposed to happen on the > user@hive list. Maybe we want to change this? > > Thanks. > > - Carl > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Yes. The vote passes with 12 +1s out of 17 currently active PMC members. > I > > will update the wiki with the new bylaws. > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Ashutosh Chauhan <hashut...@apache.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > Seems like there is consensus all around. > > > Vikram, > > > would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ashutosh > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pras...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > Prasad > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K < > vikram.di...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > > > > > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the > interest > > > of > > > > > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch > > > committers > > > > > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an > > > addition > > > > > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project > > > bylaws > > > > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html ) > > > > > > > > > > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a > speculative > > > > > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the > > branch > > > > to > > > > > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch > > > > > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an > > active > > > > > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project." > > > > > > > > > > Actions: New Branch Committer > > > > > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the > project. > > > > > Approval: Lazy Consensus > > > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members > > > > > Minimum Length: 3 days > > > > > Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer > > > > > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project. > > > > > Approval: Consensus > > > > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in > question > > > if > > > > > they are PMC members too. > > > > > Minimum Length: 6 days > > > > > Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Vikram. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work. > > -Mark > > > -- Nothing better than when appreciated for hard work. -Mark
