Seems like there is consensus all around. Vikram, would you like to update the wiki with new bylaws?
Thanks, Ashutosh On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Prasad Mujumdar <pras...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > thanks > Prasad > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Vikram Dixit K <vikram.di...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > We seem to have quite a few projects going around and in the interest of > > time and the project as a whole, it seems good to have branch committers > > much like what is there in the Hadoop project. I am proposing an addition > > to the committer bylaws as follows ( taken from the hadoop project bylaws > > http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html ) > > > > "Significant, pervasive features are often developed in a speculative > > branch of the repository. The PMC may grant commit rights on the branch > to > > its consistent contributors, while the initiative is active. Branch > > committers are responsible for shepherding their feature into an active > > release and do not cast binding votes or vetoes in the project." > > > > Actions: New Branch Committer > > Description: When a new branch committer is proposed for the project. > > Approval: Lazy Consensus > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members > > Minimum Length: 3 days > > Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org > > > > Actions: Removal of Branch Committer > > Description: When a branch committer is removed from the project. > > Approval: Consensus > > Binding Votes: Active PMC members excluding the committer in question if > > they are PMC members too. > > Minimum Length: 6 days > > Mailing List: priv...@hive.apache.org > > > > This vote will run for 6 days. PMC members please vote. > > > > Thanks > > Vikram. > > >
