Hi Jonny, Can you create a Jira ticket please? I don't plan to re-roll the release at this stage and we can fix it in the next release, but I'll await any further comments from Daniel/Eric who seem to be involved in earlier commits.
Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 7:08 AM Jonny <jonny...@apache.org> wrote: > I've traced the issue back to 33064484cc043bfb7c2ad75ee8fccbcbc6329b76. I > think I've hit upon a fix <https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/2270>, > pending review. Apologies for doing this on the release thread. Feel free > to tell me that I'm out of order or just need to wait for the next release > train. 😅 > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 3:38 PM Jonny <jonny...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Trying out the latest snapshot for 4.0.28, I'm encountering an error >> locally in my company's app's test suite. Based on the origin of the tests, >> this seems to be a regression of GROOVY-9526 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9526>, or at least in that >> vicinity. >> >> I've created a test (similar to the one we had in our app), which >> demonstrates the problem. >> >> https://github.com/apache/groovy/compare/GROOVY_4_0_X...jonnybot0:groovy:GROOVY-9526-regression-semantic-analysis-exception?expand=1 >> >> This was not failing as recently as a week or two ago, so I suspect it's >> a relatively recent change. >> >> I'm open to being told that the semantics I'm using in this test are >> truly just invalid and unsupported, but I'll need some clearer idea *why* >> they >> are, as we may need to pass some guidance on to our users. >> >> Trying to raise this before release in case it's an easy fix. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 1:24 PM Milles, Eric (TR Technology) via dev < >> dev@groovy.apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> >>> *Sent:* Sunday, July 20, 2025 5:45 AM >>> *To:* Groovy_Developers <dev@groovy.apache.org> >>> *Subject:* [EXT] [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 (Take 2) >>> >>> *External Email:* Use caution with links and attachments. >>> >>> >>> Dear development community, >>> >>> I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 4.0.28 release! >>> >>> This release includes 19 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the >>> changelog: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12355971 >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12355971__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFXtjuJpCA$> >>> >>> Tag: >>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/GROOVY_4_0_28 >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=groovy.git;a=tag;h=refs*tags*GROOVY_4_0_28__;Ly8!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFW7LMEnig$> >>> Tag commit id: bc6204944686858db9c6f195909f2258ad1d2a62 >>> >>> The artifacts to be voted on are located as follows (r78267). >>> Source release: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/sources >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/sources__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFWv2nPY5Q$> >>> Convenience binaries: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/distribution >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/groovy/4.0.28/distribution__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUl-otI_w$> >>> >>> Release artifacts are signed with a key from the following file: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/groovy/KEYS__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFW7lBIg0Q$> >>> >>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Groovy 4.0.28. >>> >>> Reminder on ASF release approval requirements for PMC members: >>> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html*release-approval__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUegGEwiw$> >>> Hints on validating checksums/signatures (but replace md5sum with >>> sha256sum): >>> https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.apache.org/info/verification.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!fvFuM-SRUpSaaLUHSSfvsP2YIgTH2TFKF_YrP6xqsqicrylv3_I8pvEkEVRyOcAlLLSjZ8JsbO95wFUZ9EcRCw$> >>> >>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 >>> [ ] 0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok >>> [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 4.0.28 because... >>> >>> Here is my vote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>>
