PS: Sorry to criticize, Daniel. Your efforts for Groovy are much
appreciated - and Happy Birthday from me, whenever the exact date is G-)
On 04/11/2019 20:43, Daniel.Sun wrote:
This is just a reference implementation, we can tweak it over time.
Now that you have a prototype in hand for conversion to ClosureExpression
with nested SwitchStatement, would it be a good idea to at least try the
SwitchExpression route to see how much effort difference is involved?
As Cédric said, he wanted to implement a lot of features but had no time. I
can feel that he really likes Groovy. Frankly, same to me, I'm not sure if I
have enough time to tweak it in the near future... In order to push the
progress of Groovy 3, I sleep for 3~4 hours a day recently... It's 3:30 a.m.
in Shanghai... Please call me super man ;-) And the reason why I set aside
extra time on features of Groovy 3.X / Groovy 4 is that my birthday is
coming, I try to make a "gift" for myself. If you like it too, that's great.
If not, it does not matter, I'll keep it :-)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
-----
Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
