This is just a reference implementation, we can tweak it over time. > Now that you have a prototype in hand for conversion to ClosureExpression > with nested SwitchStatement, would it be a good idea to at least try the > SwitchExpression route to see how much effort difference is involved?
As Cédric said, he wanted to implement a lot of features but had no time. I can feel that he really likes Groovy. Frankly, same to me, I'm not sure if I have enough time to tweak it in the near future... In order to push the progress of Groovy 3, I sleep for 3~4 hours a day recently... It's 3:30 a.m. in Shanghai... Please call me super man ;-) And the reason why I set aside extra time on features of Groovy 3.X / Groovy 4 is that my birthday is coming, I try to make a "gift" for myself. If you like it too, that's great. If not, it does not matter, I'll keep it :-) Cheers, Daniel.Sun ----- Apache Groovy committer & PMC member Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me Twitter: @daniel_sun -- Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
