How can we revive this discussion? I still think it's relevant. :)
Best regards / Med venlig hilsen, Søren Berg Glasius Hedevej 1, Gl. Rye, 8680 Ry, Denmark Mobile: +45 40 44 91 88, Skype: sbglasius --- Press ESC once to quit - twice to save the changes. On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 at 17:40, MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > ...and, of course, the > > Apache Groovy Community Lifetime Achievement Award > > ;-) > > Like the name, +1 (again) on tying the award to a specific year, don't > think that mixing commit access with the award makes sense (as in > programming: Keep things single purpose - nobdy wants to be fat, be it > class or human ;-) ) > > > On 02.03.2018 10:11, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > > hi all, > > > > I was thinking a while about all this and all the problems involved > > here and I want to show an alternative. > > > > Apache Groovy Community Award > > > > Name surely to be changed. The idea is to give a nominal award for > > what they did in the past. Somebody getting this award will get this > > for a reason, which is to be stated. > > > > Since it is no title like "champion" and since we can give a > > description of the reasons the award will be always specific, it is > > not a title you carry around your lifetime and all of that. Maybe a > > person could be awarded multiple times, but that is then to decide. > > That means there will be no discussions about revoking the > > championship, or for how long this is granted. Also I think the award > > leaves better space for a good naming. Also we can give commit access > > along with it, which may or may not be taken, but then includes the > > official ASF way of recognizing people. > > > > what do you guys think? > > > > bye Jochen > > > >
