Hi Jochen,
I really like your suggestion! which can solve all problems caused by
closure's versatility.
Groovy is groovy because it is Groovy, i.e. not another Java. Closure
is a killer feature in Groovy, so it's better to refine it if possible ;-)
P.S. another crazy proposal, make closure based on native lambda in
all cases... then closure will be much thinner and should gain better
performance.
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
-----
Apache Groovy committer
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
