That's interesting. What about the various cases, like no-arg closures? On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:37 AM Paolo Di Tommaso <paolo.ditomm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nice! > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:50 AM Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I've been developing a project with Groovy 3. When I try to specify >> the generics type for closure, I have to use annotation..., which is quite >> verbose... e.g. >> ``` >> public <V> V withSql(@ClosureParams(value= SimpleType.class, >> options="groovy.sql.Sql") Closure<V> closure) >> ``` >> >> I propose make the above code groovier, e.g. >> ``` >> public <V> V withSql(Closure<groovy.sql.Sql -> V> closure) >> ``` >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel.Sun >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >> > -- Guillaume Laforge Apache Groovy committer Developer Advocate @ Google Cloud Platform Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ Twitter: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge>
