I am not a lawyer but as far as I know they offer commercial support as well as completely free via ASL2. But yes, a little bit different to normal. In any case, I was suggesting that it as much a source of inspiration than the only alternative to look at.
Cheers, Paul. On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:58 AM MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > Isn't jOOQ no longer completely OS: > http://www.jooq.org/legal/licensing#databases ? > > Quote from their main page: > "Use this *free edition *with your favourite *Open Source DB* using the > popular Apache Software License 2.0!" > > > On 22.10.2018 01:28, Paul King wrote: > > The other thing worth thinking about is comparing what you propose with > what is available in existing Java libraries and directed at Java > developers. Jooq comes to mind: > > https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ > > Be worth think about whether a tiny DSL (if needed) above that is a viable > alternative to achieve what you are after. > > Cheers, Paul. > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 7:39 AM MG <mg...@arscreat.com> wrote: > >> Hi K, >> >> as I said, your proposal overlaps in some areas with what my framework >> does, so I was suggesting you keep the functionality and naming >> conventions I listed in my last mail in mind when designing the DSL. >> My framework is more geared towards developers, who need to be able to >> batch create RDBMS objects, such as e.g. >> packages/function/procedures/views for different DB users (e.g. exposing >> different columns or using different filter criteria in a select >> statement depending on the need-to-know of the appliction behind the DB >> user), and who want Intellisense support when writing SQL queries, >> working with table/view column collections, etc. >> >> Apart from that, if all you want to supply is a simple DSL over Groovy >> Sql which is mostly for non-developers / scripting use (so no >> Intellisense I assume), then I personally would suggest you flesh it >> out, then ask for some feed back and then go ahead implementing a first >> rough version :-) >> >> Cheers, >> mg >> >> >> On 20.10.2018 20:38, adithyank wrote: >> > Hi MG, >> > >> > The objective of my proposal is to make "Database querying and result >> > processing" more handy also for non developers. i.e., mostly people who >> can >> > write shell scripts or some simple perl scripts. >> > >> > In that view, I proposed a wrapper DSL overy groovy's `Sql` class. >> > >> > I feel that your idea is needs a bit more work for the script writers >> (may >> > be developers or just script writers) as it has some more concepts that >> > people have to understand. >> > >> > Any thoughts on this ? How should I proceed now? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > K Adithyan >> > India >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html >> > >> >> >
