Hi K,

as I said, your proposal overlaps in some areas with what my framework does, so I was suggesting you keep the functionality and naming conventions I listed in my last mail in mind when designing the DSL. My framework is more geared towards developers, who need to be able to batch create RDBMS objects, such as e.g. packages/function/procedures/views for different DB users (e.g. exposing different columns or using different filter criteria in a select statement depending on the need-to-know of the appliction behind the DB user), and who want Intellisense support when writing SQL queries, working with table/view column collections, etc.

Apart from that, if all you want to supply is a simple DSL over Groovy Sql which is mostly for non-developers / scripting use (so no Intellisense I assume), then I personally would suggest you flesh it out, then ask for some feed back and then go ahead implementing a first rough version :-)

Cheers,
mg


On 20.10.2018 20:38, adithyank wrote:
Hi MG,

The objective of my proposal is to make "Database querying and result
processing" more handy also for non developers. i.e., mostly people who can
write shell scripts or some simple perl scripts.

In that view, I proposed a wrapper DSL overy groovy's `Sql` class.

I feel that your idea is needs a bit more work for the script writers (may
be developers or just script writers) as it has some more concepts that
people have to understand.

Any thoughts on this ? How should I proceed now?

Thanks,

K Adithyan
India






--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html


Reply via email to