Hi Jesper,
> Be careful with that approach, as it won’t work for static methods —
> leading to very different semantics for the two languages.
'.&' can reference the static methods, here is the sample code:
[1, 2, 3].each(Objects.&requireNonNull)
> Also, you won’t be able to support constructor references without some
> new AST construct, I guess.
As you said, '.&' does not support constructors..., the following code
is valid in Java, but I have no idea the equivalent in Groovy.
GenericsType[]::new
Thanks for your reminding :)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
View this message in context:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Lambda-expression-for-Groovy-3-tp5736169p5736201.html
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
