Hi Daniel Be careful with that approach, as it won’t work for static methods — leading to very different semantics for the two languages. Also, you won’t be able to support constructor references without some new AST construct, I guess.
-Jesper > On 19. okt. 2016, at 12.23, daniel_sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Jochen, > > I plan to map Java's *::* to Groovy's *.&*, the following code is ok > now. What do you think about it? > > [1, 2, 3].stream().forEach(System.out.&println) // object method, > [1, 2, 3].stream().forEach(System.out::println) > [1, 2, 3].stream().forEach(Objects.&requireNonNull) // class method, [1, 2, > 3].stream().forEach(Objects::requireNonNull) > > Cheers, > Daniel.Sun > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Lambda-expression-for-Groovy-3-tp5736169p5736195.html > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
