Hi Paul,
not sure but I think the website could be a better place for the roadmap
than the documentation. What do you think?
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 20.01.2016 um 13:49 schrieb Paul King:
I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the
new documentation to replace the old page but I agree as others have
said that there is no point in having unrealistic goals - so something
quite small is what I think we need. I'll try to come up with
something hopefully next week unless someone else wants to jump in.
Cheers, Paul.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Marc Paquette <mar...@mac.com> wrote:
WaybackMachine has it : here is the entry on 2015-01-02 :
https://web.archive.org/web/20150102193203/http://groovy.codehaus.org/Roadmap
But, as Cédric says, it is definetely not realistic (in retrospective :-)...
Le 19 janv. 2016 à 14:13, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
I honestly don't think it's a problem that the roadmap disappeared. I have
never seen a single Groovy roadmap that was up-to-date or realistic. My
personal thought it that the roadmap is what the users want. So it depends
on the pull requests we get, as well as what users want us to implement. At
best, we can have a 3 to 6 months roadmap, but anything longer is
unrealistic.
2016-01-19 20:10 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>:
The roadmap document disappeared together with codehaus :(
Am 19.01.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Aseem Bansal:
Hi
This came up during gr8conf India. I asked Paul King and he said that to
ask the community so it is known.
I tried looking for groovy's roadmap but couldn't find anything. Where is
it present?
