I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the new documentation to replace the old page but I agree as others have said that there is no point in having unrealistic goals - so something quite small is what I think we need. I'll try to come up with something hopefully next week unless someone else wants to jump in.
Cheers, Paul. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Marc Paquette <mar...@mac.com> wrote: > WaybackMachine has it : here is the entry on 2015-01-02 : > https://web.archive.org/web/20150102193203/http://groovy.codehaus.org/Roadmap > > But, as Cédric says, it is definetely not realistic (in retrospective :-)... > > > Le 19 janv. 2016 à 14:13, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > I honestly don't think it's a problem that the roadmap disappeared. I have > never seen a single Groovy roadmap that was up-to-date or realistic. My > personal thought it that the roadmap is what the users want. So it depends > on the pull requests we get, as well as what users want us to implement. At > best, we can have a 3 to 6 months roadmap, but anything longer is > unrealistic. > > 2016-01-19 20:10 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>: >> >> The roadmap document disappeared together with codehaus :( >> >> >> Am 19.01.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Aseem Bansal: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> This came up during gr8conf India. I asked Paul King and he said that to >>> ask the community so it is known. >>> >>> I tried looking for groovy's roadmap but couldn't find anything. Where is >>> it present? >> >> > >
