Yep. We are waiting for CXF (expected next week) and OWB (no response yet) ;-)
Don't know how fast INFRA is today for a SVN to Git Migration but would be good to just fully migrate the SVN Specs to Git. I cannot open the Jira though because Infra insists on a PMC member to do that (discussed it for another TLP). So can anyone do that? Gruß Richard Am 4. Dezember 2024 08:08:01 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >Yes release plugin hides all the details but guess we should ensure we do >it from git and have svn read-only since there is no urgence (tomee awaits >for other releases AFAIK) > >Romain Manni-Bucau >@rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | Blog ><https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog ><http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book ><https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> > > >Le mar. 3 déc. 2024 à 22:21, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > >> @Francois: I think the process is similar. Tagging and commit is done by >> the release plugin, so should not be different aside from having SVN >> Tooling available. Maybe give it a try? (i am sure the Geronimo Slack is >> able to assist in case of issues). >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> >> Am 2. Dezember 2024 15:45:10 MEZ schrieb Francois Papon < >> francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: >> >>> Ok :) >>> >>> It's hard for me to sync that on Monday after 6 hours of meeting :( >>> >>> Let me cancel this vote. >>> >>> However about the release of the spec on SVN, I'm not sure I can do >>> that, I never done any release on SVN...I don't want to create a >>> blackhole :D >>> >>> NB: should I revert the github repository from the release? I think so >>> because it's about the impl, right? >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> François >>> fpa...@apache.org >>> francois.pa...@openobject.fr >>> >>> Le 01/12/2024 à 11:14, Richard Zowalla a écrit : >>> >>>> Ok, I just re-checked ;-) >>>> >>>> What we actually need is a release of the Geronimo Java Mail 2.1 >>>> ___Spec___, which is still in SVN: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 >>>> >>>> On GitHub, we have the implementation part, which is not that >>>> important. Of course, we should do a release of it once we have the >>>> fixed spec available. >>>> >>>> Sowe don't need an INFRA ticket here as all the specs are still on SVN >>>> and everything is actually fine. It is just confusing that there is >>>> some part on SVN an some part on GitHub :) >>>> >>>> @Francois: Sorry, I didn't specified it correctly in my first mail >>>> asking for a release :) - I should have written "spec" but the EE mail >>>> world is actually hardly tied to impls... >>>> >>>> Gruß >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> >>>> Am Sonntag, dem 01.12.2024 um 11:05 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: >>>> >>>>> Yep, can create an INFRA Ticket with reference to this thread, so we >>>>> can get it fixed up. >>>>> >>>>> Gruß >>>>> Richard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 1. Dezember 2024 10:33:54 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> I'd say open a ticket to infra to make svn read only, ensure git is >>>>>> sync-ed to not loose anything from anywhere. >>>>>> Generally truth is git (history direction) but we are human beings >>>>>> ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Le dim. 1 déc. 2024 à 06:47, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> >>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> I am always confused where to find the truth in Geronimo, so all >>>>>>> fine :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess, the actual issue is, that the SVN repo is/was not read >>>>>>> only. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So how to proceed? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would suggest that we use SVN for this release and migrate to >>>>>>> git afterwards (dropping what is there). We released a version >>>>>>> from SVN and made changes, so the tag is also in SVN. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 1. Dezember 2024 00:19:47 MEZ schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >>>>>>> <jeano...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I thought this one was still on SVN. Sorry if I messed up >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 20:20, Richard Zowalla >>>>>>>> <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Actually, the last release (1.0.0.made by JL) was made from >>>>>>>>> SVN and the commits, which broke the milestone, were also >>>>>>>>> done on SVN. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So there is an inconsistency for the source of truth here and >>>>>>>>> GitHub is already missing changes... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 30. November 2024 17:53:16 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We migrated to gitbox but thought we made svn dir readonly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 16:18, Richard Zowalla >>>>>>>>>> <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good question. Didn't know it is on GitHub, so the patch >>>>>>>>>>> was in SVN: >>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 30. November 2024 15:31:31 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni- >>>>>>>>>>> Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello François, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What is the difference with last release >>>>>>>>>>>> (https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/commits/tr >>>>>>>>>>>> unk/)? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | >>>>>>>>>>>> Book >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 29 nov. 2024 à 21:41, Francois Papon >>>>>>>>>>>> <fpa...@apache.org> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I submit Apache Geronimo Java Mail 2.1_1.0.1 release >>>>>>>>>>>>> to your vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This release mainly includes (other issue description >>>>>>>>>>>>> is available on >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release note): >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ** Bug >>>>>>>>>>>>> * [GERONIMO-6871] - InternetHeaders to rejects >>>>>>>>>>>>> well-formed headers >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging Maven repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1174/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging dist repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide >>>>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
