Yep, can create an INFRA Ticket with reference to this thread, so we can get it fixed up.
Gruß Richard Am 1. Dezember 2024 10:33:54 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >I'd say open a ticket to infra to make svn read only, ensure git is sync-ed >to not loose anything from anywhere. > >Generally truth is git (history direction) but we are human beings ;) > >Le dim. 1 déc. 2024 à 06:47, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > >> I am always confused where to find the truth in Geronimo, so all fine :-) >> >> I guess, the actual issue is, that the SVN repo is/was not read only. >> >> So how to proceed? >> >> I would suggest that we use SVN for this release and migrate to git >> afterwards (dropping what is there). We released a version from SVN and >> made changes, so the tag is also in SVN. >> >> WDYT? >> >> >> >> Am 1. Dezember 2024 00:19:47 MEZ schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < >> jeano...@gmail.com>: >> >>> I thought this one was still on SVN. Sorry if I messed up >>> >>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 20:20, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Actually, the last release (1.0.0.made by JL) was made from SVN and the >>>> commits, which broke the milestone, were also done on SVN. >>>> >>>> So there is an inconsistency for the source of truth here and GitHub is >>>> already missing changes... >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 30. November 2024 17:53:16 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>> We migrated to gitbox but thought we made svn dir readonly. >>>>> >>>>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 16:18, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Good question. Didn't know it is on GitHub, so the patch was in SVN: >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 30. November 2024 15:31:31 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello François, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the difference with last release ( >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/commits/trunk/)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>>>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le ven. 29 nov. 2024 à 21:41, Francois Papon <fpa...@apache.org> a >>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I submit Apache Geronimo Java Mail 2.1_1.0.1 release to your vote. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available >>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> the release note): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ** Bug >>>>>>>> * [GERONIMO-6871] - InternetHeaders to rejects well-formed >>>>>>>> headers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Staging Maven repository: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1174/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Staging dist repository: >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>
