well if that's the direction we take I'm tempted to say that: in both cases
we are perfectly legally fine
so we should just move forward the release if that's the only issue found.
Then once passed we should solve it in a dedicated thread.

This means that it is not needed to mention this one anymore in the context
of this vote IMHO.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

2018-03-19 15:29 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <[email protected]>:

> well, that's why we had the BSD in there! You see?
>
> And no, the current NOTICE is NOT wrong. The BSD-3clause, the ALv2 etc
> allow to create a derivative work which is under another license. And this
> is why we have
>
> "Apache XBean Copyright 2005-2013 The Apache Software Foundation"
>
> in the NOTICE file.
>
> But of course, by removing the BSD part from the NOTICE file this is now
> totally off.
> Note that the original legal ticket was created for a project which only
> had a very few BSD classes. In our case the majority or work is BSD. Still
> the summary derivative work (our shaded bundle) is ALv2.
>
> So my personal opinion is to revert back to the previous version of the
> NOTICE!
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> On Monday, 19 March 2018, 15:11:23 CET, John D. Ament <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> -1
> The NOTICE file in the JAR is now worse.  It indicates that the code was
> developed at the ASF.
>
> IMHO, there should be no NOTICE file in the JAR.
>
> If the NOTICE file includes just
>
> Apache XBean :: ASM 6 shaded (repackaged)
> Copyright 2005-2018 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> That should be enough.
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:01 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.7.
>
> Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/
> repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1053
> The source distribution can be found here: https://repository.
> apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1053/org/
> apache/xbean/xbean/4.7/xbean-4.7-source-release.zip
> sha1 is c17fb38c503b0d0c0798b0fde9cf1544d19681d0
>
> Change is only about upgrade asm to 6.1 (java 10) and fixing asm NOTICE
> file.
>
> [+1] ship it
> [-1] nope, stop because ${reason}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>

Reply via email to