this is the generated/standard notice file and it is valid cause it contains our xbean-asm-util module (this is not a 100% asm shade)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-03-19 15:11 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <[email protected]>: > -1 > The NOTICE file in the JAR is now worse. It indicates that the code was > developed at the ASF. > > IMHO, there should be no NOTICE file in the JAR. > > If the NOTICE file includes just > > Apache XBean :: ASM 6 shaded (repackaged) > Copyright 2005-2018 The Apache Software Foundation > > That should be enough. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:01 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.7. >> >> Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/ >> repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1053 >> The source distribution can be found here: https://repository. >> apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1053/org/ >> apache/xbean/xbean/4.7/xbean-4.7-source-release.zip >> sha1 is c17fb38c503b0d0c0798b0fde9cf1544d19681d0 >> >> Change is only about upgrade asm to 6.1 (java 10) and fixing asm NOTICE >> file. >> >> [+1] ship it >> [-1] nope, stop because ${reason} >> >> The VOTE is open for 72h. >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >
