Thanks :) I wrote "project" someplace, obviously not in the wiki itself :)
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Dave Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > Grammar tweak - "the Apache Geode" didn't parse. I changed "follow the > development > process and community standards of the Apache Geode" to "follow the > development > process and standards of the Apache Geode community". > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Greg Chase <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Revised per Dan's feedback, with my suggested phrasing: > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Becoming+a+committer > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Gregory Chase <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I'm ok with striking existing #2. > > > > > > So maybe we rephrase the nomination criteria as an instruction to > > > Committers: > > > > > > New #2. Contributors are nominated by a Committer to be granted > > > Commit privileges by the Apache Geode PPMC. > > > > > > New #3. Committers should nominate fellow contributors when a candidate > > > has shown a consistent history of participating in the development > > process > > > or community, and has demonstrated that they understand and follow the > > > development process and community standards of the Apache Geode. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Mark Bretl <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 For Dan's updates. I agree #2 does not help with understanding > > > criteria. > > > > > > > > --Mark > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Dan Smith <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Looks pretty good to me. I'd suggest a slight edit #3: > > > > > > > > > > Once a contributor shows a consistent history of participating in > the > > > > > development process or community *and has demonstrated that they > > > > understand > > > > > the development process and standards can be trusted with commit > > > > access*, a > > > > > Committer should nominate them to the Apache Geode PPMC for > > > consideration > > > > > to become a Committer. > > > > > > > > > > I would remove #2 - it's a good point, but it's not really helping > > > > someone > > > > > understand what the criteria are for becoming a committer > > > > > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Jens Deppe <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Greg Chase <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > > Per the discuss thread on this topic, I've added new text to > our > > > wiki > > > > > > page > > > > > > > describing how to become a Committer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This text includes a generalized description of what I believe > > the > > > > > > > consensus is in the discussion thread. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Changed page can be found here: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Becoming+a+committer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lazy consensus applies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Greg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Greg Chase > > > > > > Director of Big Data Communities > > > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data > > > > > > Pivotal Software > > > http://www.pivotal.io/ > > > > > > 650-215-0477 > > > @GregChase > > > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ > > > > > > -- Greg Chase Director of Big Data Communities http://www.pivotal.io/big-data Pivotal Software http://www.pivotal.io/ 650-215-0477 @GregChase Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/
