I remember that third-party contrib organizations shall not use the same name of "fluss", which is a documented trademark policy in [1]
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/guide This is why SkyWalking's contrib org is called SkyAPM [2] and why the ResillenceDB shuts down their previous orgs [3]. [2] https://github.com/SkyAPM [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/gdx2rz2byfxtr0ftqy1tcmvl47gphcro So, for the situation we are here, I suggest: 1. We may directly create new repos for contrib code. This would handle the IP clearance issue beforehand as well. 2. Or, if there is a reason we must not hold the code within the ASF, use a distinguished name for the org. Best, tison. Muhammet Orazov via dev <[email protected]> 于2026年7月20日周一 16:01写道： > Hello Yang, > > Thanks taking of this! > > All looks fine from my side, +1. > > We'd like to start with Fluss K8s operator on this organization, but > definitely donate back to ASF on later stages. > > Best, > Muhammet Orazov >
