Ok, after waiting for the appropriate time (3 days) to pass, I am now closing 
the voting on the Stale PR GitHub Action proposal. 

Summary below:

+1:
  Binding (3):
    - Gyula Fóra
    - Ron Liu
    - Rui Fan
 
  Non-binding (5):
    - Ahmed Hamdy
    - David Radley
    - Luke Chen 
    - Andrei Kaigorodov
    - Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan
 
No 0 or -1 votes.

I added a page [1] to the CHI section of the Flink Wiki, summarising the 
proposal and linking the Discussion and Vote threads on the mailing list.

I created FLINK-37026 [2] and will put up the PR for review later today.

Thanks,

Tom Cooper
@tomncooper | tomcooper.dev

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Stale+PR+Cleanup
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37026

On Wednesday, 8 January 2025 at 06:21, Venkatakrishnan Sowrirajan 
<vsowr...@asu.edu> wrote:

> Thanks Tom for driving this, finally we are tackling the stale PR issues.
> 
> Late +1 (non binding)
> 
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025, 12:25 PM Andrei Kaigorodov andreykaygoro...@gmail.com
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > 
> > Thanks Tom for driving this!
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Andrei Kaigorodov
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 5:27 PM Tom Cooper c...@tomcooper.dev wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Sergey,
> > > 
> > > You make a very good point, I got a bit trigger happy when I got 3
> > > binding
> > > +1s.
> > > 
> > > This change doesn't fit neatly into one of the categories on the by-law
> > > page, but it is a big change, so I will leave the vote open for another
> > > day
> > > (3 in total) in case there are any dissenting opinions.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Tom Cooper
> > > @tomncooper | tomcooper.dev
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 16:20, Sergey Nuyanzin <
> > > snuyan...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hi Tom
> > > > 
> > > > thanks for driving this
> > > > 
> > > > one thing to clarify: If I understand correctly if the vote has been
> > > > started it is still too early to close it
> > > > at least based on [1] the minimum length for for voting is 3 days
> > > > (however
> > > > it is still not clear to me: as which action this one should be
> > > > considered)
> > > > 
> > > > [1]
> > 
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026*FlinkBylaws-Actions__;Iw!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!YtJhcRBps-4vJE9LVlCwUMZveoaXQ9HIFvioHDjv2U83qrDb5ufHn5OoSK-uIE8m73UmQ8qmw5hqjfaJMw_CKLyZ5eBIPPI$
> > 
> > > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 4:39 PM Hong h...@apache.org wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Huge +1 (non-binding) to this! Sad that I was late to this thread,
> > > > > but
> > > > > I
> > > > > agree completely with what has been said around keeping stale PRs
> > > > > breeding
> > > > > inaction!
> > > > > Thank you Tom for driving this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hong
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On 7 Jan 2025, at 23:30, Tom Cooper c...@tomcooper.dev wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks for the votes everyone. Summary below:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +1:
> > > > > > Binding (3):
> > > > > > - Gyula Fóra
> > > > > > - Ron Liu
> > > > > > - Rui Fan
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Non-binding (3):
> > > > > > - Ahmed Hamdy
> > > > > > - David Radley
> > > > > > - Luke Chen
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > No 0 or -1 votes.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I added a page [1] to the CHI section of the Flink Wiki,
> > > > > > summarising
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > proposal and linking the Discussion and Vote threads on the mailing
> > > > > > list.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I will create a JIRA and put up the PR for review.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Tom Cooper
> > > > > > @tomncooper | tomcooper.dev
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > [1]
> > 
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Stale*PR*Cleanup__;Kys!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!YtJhcRBps-4vJE9LVlCwUMZveoaXQ9HIFvioHDjv2U83qrDb5ufHn5OoSK-uIE8m73UmQ8qmw5hqjfaJMw_CKLyZdjLUtww$
> > 
> > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 14:13, Ahmed Hamdy
> > > > > > > hamdy10...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks Tom
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > Best Regards
> > > > > > > Ahmed Hamdy
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 16:43, David Radley
> > > > > > > > david_rad...@uk.ibm.com
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this Tom.
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > David
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > From: Gyula Fóra gyula.f...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > Date: Monday, 6 January 2025 at 16:33
> > > > > > > > To: dev@flink.apache.org dev@flink.apache.org
> > > > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] CHI: Stale PR cleanup
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:12 PM Tom Cooper c...@tomcooper.dev
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Following on from my proposal [1] at the end of last year. I
> > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > hoping
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > get a vote on enabling the stale PR Github Action in the
> > > > > > > > > Flink
> > > > > > > > > repository.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > There was positive feedback on the proposal and the most
> > > > > > > > > popular
> > > > > > > > > initial
> > > > > > > > > configuration was notifying when a PR has been untouched for
> > > > > > > > > 6
> > > > > > > > > months
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > then closing after a further 3 months of inactivity.
> > > > > > > > > We can review this configuration at a later date, with the
> > > > > > > > > aim
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > bringing
> > > > > > > > > it in line with other Apache projects (3 months inactive with
> > > > > > > > > 1 month
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > reactivate).
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Tom Cooper
> > 
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tomcooper.dev__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!YtJhcRBps-4vJE9LVlCwUMZveoaXQ9HIFvioHDjv2U83qrDb5ufHn5OoSK-uIE8m73UmQ8qmw5hqjfaJMw_CKLyZnuccgao$
> > 
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > 
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.apache.org/thread/6yoclzmvymxors8vlpt4nn9r7t3stcsz__;!!IKRxdwAv5BmarQ!YtJhcRBps-4vJE9LVlCwUMZveoaXQ9HIFvioHDjv2U83qrDb5ufHn5OoSK-uIE8m73UmQ8qmw5hqjfaJMw_CKLyZhvvRJvo$
> > 
> > > > > > > > Unless otherwise stated above:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited
> > > > > > > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> > > > > > > > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park
> > > > > > > > Road,
> > > > > > > > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Sergey

Reply via email to