Hi Sergey, You make a very good point, I got a bit trigger happy when I got 3 binding +1s.
This change doesn't fit neatly into one of the categories on the by-law page, but it is a big change, so I will leave the vote open for another day (3 in total) in case there are any dissenting opinions. Thanks, Tom Cooper @tomncooper | tomcooper.dev On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 16:20, Sergey Nuyanzin <snuyan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tom > > thanks for driving this > > one thing to clarify: If I understand correctly if the vote has been > started it is still too early to close it > at least based on [1] the minimum length for for voting is 3 days (however > it is still not clear to me: as which action this one should be considered) > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026#FlinkBylaws-Actions > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 4:39 PM Hong h...@apache.org wrote: > > > Huge +1 (non-binding) to this! Sad that I was late to this thread, but I > > agree completely with what has been said around keeping stale PRs breeding > > inaction! > > Thank you Tom for driving this. > > > > Hong > > > > > On 7 Jan 2025, at 23:30, Tom Cooper c...@tomcooper.dev wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the votes everyone. Summary below: > > > > > > +1: > > > Binding (3): > > > - Gyula Fóra > > > - Ron Liu > > > - Rui Fan > > > > > > Non-binding (3): > > > - Ahmed Hamdy > > > - David Radley > > > - Luke Chen > > > > > > No 0 or -1 votes. > > > > > > I added a page [1] to the CHI section of the Flink Wiki, summarising the > > > proposal and linking the Discussion and Vote threads on the mailing list. > > > > > > I will create a JIRA and put up the PR for review. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Tom Cooper > > > @tomncooper | tomcooper.dev > > > > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Stale+PR+Cleanup > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 14:13, Ahmed Hamdy hamdy10...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Tom > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Best Regards > > > > Ahmed Hamdy > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 16:43, David Radley david_rad...@uk.ibm.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for driving this Tom. > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > From: Gyula Fóra gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > Date: Monday, 6 January 2025 at 16:33 > > > > > To: dev@flink.apache.org dev@flink.apache.org > > > > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] CHI: Stale PR cleanup > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:12 PM Tom Cooper c...@tomcooper.dev wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Following on from my proposal [1] at the end of last year. I was > > > > > > hoping > > > > > > to > > > > > > get a vote on enabling the stale PR Github Action in the Flink > > > > > > repository. > > > > > > > > > > > > There was positive feedback on the proposal and the most popular > > > > > > initial > > > > > > configuration was notifying when a PR has been untouched for 6 > > > > > > months > > > > > > and > > > > > > then closing after a further 3 months of inactivity. > > > > > > We can review this configuration at a later date, with the aim of > > > > > > bringing > > > > > > it in line with other Apache projects (3 months inactive with 1 > > > > > > month > > > > > > to > > > > > > reactivate). > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom Cooper > > > > > > https://tomcooper.dev > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6yoclzmvymxors8vlpt4nn9r7t3stcsz > > > > > > > > > > Unless otherwise stated above: > > > > > > > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited > > > > > Registered in England and Wales with number 741598 > > > > > Registered office: Building C, IBM Hursley Office, Hursley Park Road, > > > > > Winchester, Hampshire SO21 2JN > > > > -- > Best regards, > Sergey
