Ok, thanks for your feedback. I will go ahead with disabling CI for 1.18
next week if no other objections are shared.

On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 5:21 PM Rui Fan <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Matthias for starting this discussion!
>
> +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
>
> Best,
> Rui
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 11:45 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Matthias,
> >
> > it seems that there is no traction for creating another 1.18.x bugfix
> > release, so *I'm +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM Matthias Pohl <map...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community has
> > > decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's
> requested
> > > (and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a
> > > question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76 fixes
> > > [3].
> > >
> > > The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It is
> > > failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first
> > > before releasing 1.18.2.
> > >
> > > Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to
> avoid
> > > having CI enabled for ever?
> > >
> > > Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2
> > > release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago to
> > > save resources. Any opinions on that?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate
> > > [4]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to