Thanks Matthias for starting this discussion! +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
Best, Rui On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 11:45 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > Hey Matthias, > > it seems that there is no traction for creating another 1.18.x bugfix > release, so *I'm +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.* > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM Matthias Pohl <map...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community has > > decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's requested > > (and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a > > question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76 fixes > > [3]. > > > > The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It is > > failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first > > before releasing 1.18.2. > > > > Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to avoid > > having CI enabled for ever? > > > > Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2 > > release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago to > > save resources. Any opinions on that? > > > > Best, > > Matthias > > > > [1] > > > > > https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/ > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt > > [3] > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate > > [4] > > > > > https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476 > > >
