+1 from my side, supporting two minor flink version(1.19.* & 1.120.*) makes 
sense to me.

Best,
Leonard

> 2024年10月17日 下午1:58,ConradJam <jam.gz...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> I am currently working on the Iceberg CDC Pipeline Connector, and support
> for it would be ideal, as the Iceberg Flink Connector already supports
> SinkV2. There's no reason why we shouldn't support it as well. So I'm +1
> 
> Yanquan Lv <decq12y...@gmail.com> 于2024年10月17日周四 09:55写道:
> 
>> Dear Flink devs, I would like to initiate a discussion about upgrading
>> the  bump version of FlinkCDC to Flink 1.19.
>> FlinkCDC's version was bumped to Flink 1.18 in November 2023[1],  Almost a
>> year has passed, during which Flink released two major versions, 1.19/1.20,
>> and 1.20 is a LTS version. Therefore, I think it's time to bump the version
>> to 1.19.
>> Bump the version to 1.19 has the following benefits:
>> 1) FLIP-371[2] and FLIP-372[3] introduced some new Sink APIs and modified
>> the signatures of some classes in Flink 1.19. Bump to 1.19 allows us to
>> directly reference these new interfaces to expand the downstream ecosystem.
>> For example, Iceberg recently implemented Flink Sink using these new
>> APIs[4], and we can start expanding Iceberg as the sink for the CDC
>> Pipeline.
>> 2) We can leverage some changes introduced by this jira[5] to proactively
>> trigger a checkpoint upon receiving schema changes,  thereby we can reduce
>> the complexity of supporting table structure evolution and achieve
>> end-to-end exactly once.
>> I would like to know if there are some needs to delay bumping this version
>> from the community, otherwise we could add the bump version plan to
>> FlinkCDC 3.3.
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink-cdc/pull/2463
>> [2]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-371%3A+Provide+initialization+context+for+Committer+creation+in+TwoPhaseCommittingSink
>> [3]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-372%3A+Enhance+and+synchronize+Sink+API+to+match+the+Source+API
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10179
>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32514
>> Sorry for resend again due to some issues with the email server.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best
> 
> ConradJam

Reply via email to